The Sphinx essays

The Sphinx essays The Sphinx, the enduring symbol if ancient Egypt. one of the world's most significant monuments. A monstrous 240 feet long and 66 feet high, it lies in the old kingdom quarry, carved from a core of solid bedrock and completed with masonry. Now is where we run into a problem. We cannot truly date this monument. It was thought to be around 2500BC but it could actually be in fact 9,000 years older than that. They believe this due to the erosion of it, it is not wind, but water, meaning it had to be dated back to when Egypt couldve actually had that much water. Now, how can we be so sure? This would change alot in history, and Egyptoligist are all against the thought. Well, let me tell you, I am with Mr. John Anthony West, the brilliant mind to the erosion discovery, on this one, and now I will tell you why. This is an open and shut case. The Sphinx definatly shows that it has water erosion, no wind erosion as many of the monuments supposedly built around its time, even with the same limestone. I do not see why Egyptoligist need evidence for earlier civilization to believe it. You can not just dig anywhere and find an artifact, you know, these things take time. Also, I dont believe you really need that evidence, it is all infront of your face. Network TV, so what?! Yes maybe it was meant for entertainment, but it was also meant to get their point across. More people will watch the Network stations than the learning channel or something. This does not mean anything! The opposers also mention the weathering on the Sphinx. How come the paws dont have as much weathering? Easy! The paws were buried under sand for a long time, which hid them from wind erosion! You can trust this man. He has had many others confirm his studies also, and they all agree. He has also lead to the discovery of the chamber between the Sphinx paws. This man knows what he is talking about, and with that and the cold hard facts that ...

Prevaricate vs Procrastinate

Prevaricate vs Procrastinate Prevaricate vs Procrastinate Prevaricate vs Procrastinate By Ali Hale Two commonly confused words are prevaricate and procrastinate. They are similar in being quite formal, Latinate, words but have different meanings. Prevaricate means â€Å"to deviate from the truth† (Merriam-Webster). It is not quite so strong as â€Å"lie† but implies an intention to mislead. It is often, but not exclusively, used in reference to politicians: â€Å"It is one of the known indications of guilt to stagger and prevaricate in a story.† (Edmund Burke) â€Å"McCain will sometimes surrender to the cheap ploy or prevarication when the moment demands it, but it is often with a smirk or a wince, some hard-to-miss signal that he knows he’s up to no good.† (Matt Bai, The McCain Doctrines in the New York Times) Procrastinate means â€Å"to put off intentionally and habitually† (Merriam-Webster). The term is often used in advice on time management or self-improvement, and can also be a noun (â€Å"procrastination†). People who habitually procrastinate are â€Å"procrastinators†. â€Å"Everyone experiences the desire to procrastinate. For one reason or another, nothing is harder than doing the one task that needs to get done.† (From How to procrastinate more productively) â€Å"Procrastination is not a problem of time management or of planning. Procrastinators are not different in their ability to estimate time.† (From Why We Procrastinate in Psychology Today) Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Vocabulary category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:50 Synonyms for â€Å"Leader†225 Foreign Phrases to Inspire You20 Classic Novels You Can Read in One Sitting